![]() Early homo is extremely similar to some (but definitely not all) australopithecines. The divide between our genus and the preceding one is arbitrary. ![]() The point is that if you look at some species of australopithecines (especially those around just before the emergence of Homo) they practically blend in to Homo. ![]() The others went extinct but there was some time when our lineage overlapped with others. In fact we really should say that we are ourselves a lineage of australopithecines. Humans originated from a particular lineage of australopithecines. He has since retracted the view that any Australopithecines were knuckle walkers.Īs for the parallel existence of humans and australopithecines, that is long known and nothing worrying to any evolutionist. Only a few hominids had been recovered and Richard Leakey was referring to a different and parallel lineage that is known not to be ancestral to humans. It occurred before the discovery of Lucy and A. This is an antiquated and completely outdated debate within the scientific community. (link to follow)įrogflydandelion 25 January 2012 at 16:31 These I will look at in the next article on the subject. 187-188ĭoes the story end there? No, further to comments below this article, it is clear that Donald Johanson has changed his position regarding Lucy due to some more recent discoveries. Science, 203:321, 1979, 207:1104, 1980 - Nicholas Comninellis, Creativeĭefense, Evidence Against Evolution, Master Books, 2001, s. Donald Johanson himself, the discoverer of Lucy, later concluded that Australophitecus africanus (Lucy) was not related to humans at all. That Australopithecus was an ape and no way related to man. Sized brains, and very ape- like skulls, jaws, and faces. Powerful forearms, short hind limbs, structure of their feet, small Structure of their ear, pattern of tooth development, their long and ![]() Have been studied in painstaking detail: their manner of walking, the White, issued the following statement in Science magazine: Countless people have been convinced by the wonders of the developing embryo-falsely portrayed-that evolution must be true.Donald Johanson (the guy who discovered Lucy) and T. Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny Has Been Disproven: Why Is It Still Being Used In Biology Textbooks?ĭo human embryos replay the evolutionary history of their species as they develop? This idea has led many to believe that what is growing in a woman's womb is merely an animal that can be conveniently disposed of in its fish stage. To mark April Fools’ Day, National Geographic News summarized some historic scientific hoaxes: Piltdown Man, Cardiff Giant, Archaeoraptor, and Bigfoot. We view the facts of science not through a set of evolutionary presuppositions but through the eyewitness account contained in the Word of God. Piltdown man is not the first supposed human ancestor to fall, but like all the others-like “Nutcracker man” and “Lucy”-was replaced by new candidates. The Piltdown man fraud could be considered “the greatest example of evolutionary gullibility of the 20th century.” The faked human skull and orangutan jaw, crudely doctored to look like fossils, were touted as a missing link and proof of human evolution, until they were exposed as a fraud in 1953-about 40 years after their discovery.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |